Skip to main content
Assigners — Powered by Quality Score LLC
Commercial Vehicle & Trucking Accidents

Pursuing Hours-of-Service Violations vs. Standard Negligence Claims

Commercial truck drivers are subject to federal hours-of-service regulations limiting how long they can drive without rest. When those rules are violated, it can add a specific legal angle beyond a standard negligence claim.

Contact for price

It’s free, with no obligation to hire.

By submitting, you agree to be contacted by phone, text, or email about your project, including by automated means, even if your number is on a do-not-call list. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and TCPA Compliance page for details.

Assigners — Powered by Quality Score LLCAssigners Commitment

Your request is only shared with a service provider matched to your project and service area — never sold as part of a bulk or resold list.

Standard Negligence Claim

25%40%of settlement, typically on contingency (same range as most PI cases)

A claim based on the driver's conduct at the time of the accident — speed, attention, following distance — without a specific regulatory violation as the central theory.

Pros
  • Doesn't require proving a specific regulatory violation
  • Applicable regardless of whether hours-of-service issues are present
Cons
  • May not capture the full picture if fatigue or scheduling pressure contributed to the accident

Hours-of-Service Violation Claim

25%40%of settlement, typically on contingency (same range, added regulatory angle)

A claim that specifically incorporates evidence that the driver or carrier violated federal hours-of-service rules leading up to the accident.

Pros
  • Can strengthen a case by showing a specific, documented regulatory violation
  • May support broader claims against the carrier for scheduling or oversight failures, not just the individual driver
Cons
  • Requires obtaining and analyzing driver logs and related records
  • Not applicable if no hours-of-service violation actually occurred
01 The Verdict

Which one makes sense for you?

A standard negligence claim works regardless of the specific facts and doesn't require proving a regulatory violation. Where hours-of-service records show an actual violation, incorporating that evidence can meaningfully strengthen a case and support claims against the carrier itself for scheduling or oversight failures — but it depends on records that need to be requested and preserved before they're lost.

02 What Affects Cost

Key cost factors.

  • Whether driver logs and hours-of-service records have been or can be obtained
  • Evidence of driver fatigue at the time of the accident
  • Carrier's history of hours-of-service compliance
  • Whether the case would benefit from a claim against the carrier, not just the driver
03 Questions To Ask

Before you decide.

  • Have the driver's hours-of-service logs been requested and reviewed?
  • Is there specific evidence suggesting driver fatigue contributed to the accident?
  • Does the carrier have a documented history of hours-of-service violations?
04 FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Do hours-of-service violations automatically prove the carrier is liable?

Not automatically — a violation is strong supporting evidence, but the case still needs to establish that the violation actually contributed to causing the accident, which is typically established through expert analysis.

All figures on this page are illustrative examples for general education, not quotes, appraisals, or guarantees of actual pricing. Actual costs vary by provider, location, project scope, and market conditions — always get a specific quote before making a purchasing decision.

Next StepAssigners

Selling in legal?

Talk to our sales team about sourcing exclusive, real-time leads, warm transfers, and inbound calls.

Get Started

We typically respond within one business day.